Four real anchor citations across the workflow the Lucy 3D is bought for — the end-to-end (E2E) portion of an SRS / SRT / SBRT QA programme under the AAPM MPPG 9.a framework. Covers the direct peer-reviewed head-to-head (Sarkar 2016 · Lucy 3D vs a commercial SRS QA comparator), the practice guideline that requires an E2E phantom (Halvorsen 2017 · MPPG 9.a · 72-hour availability), the applied comparative E2E QA study quantifying film vs diode-array workflow trade-offs (Lim 2022) and the numerical commissioning-criteria thresholds a modern MLC-based SRS programme is measured against (Brown 2022). Every DOI + journal reference verified; all open-access URLs.
Peer-reviewed studies that measured LUCY™ 3D QA Phantom directly, with the key result from each paper's abstract. The quoted line shows where the paper names LUCY™ 3D QA Phantom.
End-to-end SRS QA with the phantom: targets identified within ±1 mm on all imaging modalities; dose delivered within 2% of prescription and 2 mm.
Ramaseshan R, Heydarian M.
“We have used a commercially available high precision Lucy phantom to perform comprehensive quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.”
Journal of Radiosurgery + SBRT 4(3):213 – 223 (open access) — Sarkar, Huang, Huang, Rassiah-Szegedi, Salter
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 18(5):10 – 21 (open access) — Halvorsen, Cirino, Das, Fairobent, Fontenla, Gopalakrishnan, Kabuka, Klein, Lo, Mahesh, Nash, Prisciandaro, Sharpe, Sherouse, Watkins (AAPM-RSS)
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 23(9):e13747 (open access) — Lim, Kuo, Li, Li, Ballangrud, Lovelock, Chan (Memorial Sloan Kettering)
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 23(6):e13581 (open access) — Brown, Fagerstrom, Beck, Holloway, Burton, Kaurin, Mahendra, Luckstead, Kielar, Kerns (NW Medical Physics Center)
No papers match this filter.
AAPM SRS-SBRT + linac-QA task-group reports the phantom-based E2E workflow sits inside, plus manufacturer brochure + E2E whitepaper.
Halvorsen et al. 2017 open PDF at aapm.org — the practice guideline that establishes the E2E-phantom + IROC + staff-continuity requirements for a modern SRS-SBRT programme.
Benedict et al. 2010 · Med Phys 37(8):4078-4101 — the foundational SBRT task-group report. Defines the end-to-end programme requirements a phantom like the Lucy 3D supports for non-cranial stereotactic delivery.
Dieterich et al. 2011 · Med Phys 38(6):2914-2936 — the CyberKnife-specific QA framework; names the AQA (Alignment QA) phantom for daily targeting accuracy. Applies to CyberKnife programmes running Lucy for the E2E cross-check.
The annual-QA task-group report the Lucy 3D E2E test cadence sits inside for the annual small-field / MLC / delivery-accuracy re-check.
Manufacturer product brochure — insert catalogue, dimensions, modality coverage.
Manufacturer end-to-end stereotactic QA whitepaper walking the CT-fusion + plan + deliver + measure workflow.
LUCY™ 3D QA Phantom
Each card opens a focused post for a specific specialty — clinical workflow and evidence, written for the persona you select.
Literature Radar · auto-updated daily
Fresh peer-reviewed papers on end-to-end stereotactic QA — phantom design + head-to-head studies, MPPG 9.a implementation, MLC SRS commissioning criteria, and multi-target single-isocentre / MR-guided workflows. Auto-updated from Europe PMC.
Yock AD, Luo G, All S et al.
Reyes JS, Hadjipanayis CG, Niranjan A.
Alswaiti Y, Shahwan G, Alhayek B et al.
Ho A, Yadav P, Sonabend A et al.
Utitsarn K, Watthanasarn T, Chaloemchawalit W et al.
Request brochure
Tell us who you are and we’ll send the full product brochure to your institutional email after a quick review. We respond within one working day (Mon–Fri, 9:30–18:30 IST).
A Saxsons sales engineer will review your request and send the brochure to your institutional email within one working day. You may receive a verification call before processing.
